Why men question the fairness of rupture for small crimes.

 I want to talk about how men often consider rupture punishments to extreme in some cases. I’m sure we have all heard men who accept the use of testicular rupture to punish is needed but object to it being used on crimes that aren’t considered severe. This is not to be confused with men who object to testicular punishments outright and just want to be able to disrespect women and get away with it.

 

These are people, both men and women who agree that testicular punishments are a good think and are happy they are used. They, including the men, support the use of rupture and post rupture torture. They are quick to show support for it but believe it is sometimes used incorrectly and in a way that is not always fair.

 

They often have good sounding arguments as well. They describe how a man experiencing rupture will go through at least an hour of extreme pain, usually more. Then they talk about the fact that the man has lost a testicle for the rest of his life. They say how this type of punishment is extreme and perfect for serious crimes but argue that it does not fit smaller crimes or infringements. Such as and accidental micro-aggression or an accidental miswording.  

 

Firstly I would like to point out that men and women don’t always agree all the time and don’t need to. Let’s say we have a situation where a woman hears a man assume a person who is coming to do some electrical work is a man. This is a micro-aggression and I am sure we can all accept he needs to be punished for this. She approaches him and takes him to a private area so they can talk.

 

She explains what she heard and that she would like to rupture one of his testicles as punishment. She tells him how she will very slowly torture the testicle after it has ruptured and gradually flatten it out. Now as long as he cooperates with her he is welcome to think that rupture is unfair in his case.

 

He should only express this opinion if asked and do so politely. But he is welcome to disagree and that is ok. We don’t all see the world the same way so we won’t all agree but when it comes to punishment decisions we should all respect the woman’s decision. Then in this case even though he disagrees he is punished as she desires.

 

What can also happen when a man thinks a lesser punishment is fairer and asks for that is he doesn’t know that the woman has maybe tried lesser punishments before and not found them affective. For instance a woman calls a man into a meeting room in an office and explains he has been accused of staring at women. She then explains her plan is to rupture a testicle. He agrees he needs to be punished but asks if a lesser punishment can be used instead. What he doesn’t know is 4 other men that month have been accused of staring and all received a lesser punishment. Given this the woman thinks that maybe a harsher punishment is needed to make the men behave so she chooses rupture for this man.

 

In this case the woman is right to choose rupture and has good reason to do it. If the lesser punishment worked then he would not have committed the crime. If he is a good man when she explains this to him he understands and accepts his fate. He should even apologies for questioning her and if she feels it’s needed his punishment could be extended or he could be subjected to penis burning before he feels rupture.

 

Another reason for men questioning rupture is the fact that men and women experience pain differently during male punishment. The man actually feels rupture so for him the pain is extreme but the woman just watches it so for her it is much less. The man may have felt enough pain before the testicle wall tears open but the woman might not have. She then needs to continue the torture until she is satisfied and that can mean rupture. Men often don’t realize just how satisfying rupture is for a woman. Feeling a testicle give way and squeezing it down is very pleasurable and pleasing for the woman doing it.

 

It also allows a woman to know that she has caused a man a lot of pain and that he will learn from his mistake. It is a very effective punishment method and proven to work. As rupture is happening the male shows pain and regret and the woman feels justice happening. There is good reason for rupture to be so popular with women.

 

In conclusion if a man asks nicely and accepts your decision I think a simple explanation can make him agree rupture is deserved. Men should not question women as a rule so penis burning should be considered. But if he objects too much then penis burning should be defiantly performed. Each case will be different so the woman should do what she thinks is best.

 

There are other reasons for men to question rupture being used but I hope that explains some of them.