More Shaming

More shaming

I have recently seen more instances of rupture shaming online. Sadly the men doing this are doing it anonymously online. There is a reoccurring message that women should not use rupture as a punishment or that it is only to be used in extreme cases. It looks like even the shamers know rupture has its place or know they will lose the argument about it being banned. Which in a way is a good thing because at least we all seem to be able to agree that testicle rupture as a punishment should be allowed.

The more common forms of shaming are where a woman has shared a story about a rupture she has performed then is criticised for being too harsh on the man. The shamers are often taking polite tones and are quick to state they support rupture just not in this case. They talk about how the loss of the testicle will affect the man’s life and talk about the pain he would have felt. They focus on the man’s feelings during the punishment and not the women’s feelings. Which is the wrong way to look at these situations. They describe the pain a man feels in a negative way and try to make out as if ways to prolong or increase the pain are cruel. Putting the mans feelings first is considered very selfish and unfair to the woman so this is also wrong.

They also talk about any pleasure the woman feels in a bad way and imply its wrong for a women to enjoy the act of rupture. Which again is wrong. When men are being educated they are taught that a woman’s enjoyment is an important part of the punishment and punishment maybe increased to accommodate this. Women are also strongly encouraged to be aware of their desires and take their own pleasure into account when planning a punishment. This obviously includes the use of rupture and post rupture tortures. The idea is the man benefits from the pain and learns from it. Then by enjoying the punishment the woman benefits too. So this is done so both man and woman benefit from the punishment.

They are also criticising the “better safe than sorry” approach to punishment. This is the idea that if a man is suspected of a crime but you are not sure then unless he can quickly prove he is innocent then he is found guilty.

Their goal is to guilt the woman who performed the rupture and by doing this hopefully put off other women from using rupture themselves. They want to put women off using the punishment as much as possible.

This is making women feel guilty about wanting to perform a perfectly legal act on a man and one they are entitled too.

So why is this happening?

There is a lot of information online about how to cause a testicle rupture and how the process works. Both genders have been able to learn about the process and for the most part have accepted It. This makes it harder for those against it to lie about rupture as they can be easily corrected. This is why I think more people are accepting it and why shamers are trying harder.