Answer to question 3

Another question answered. He's doing alright!

In response to

               

the idea of a kicking room has been mentioned on here. A place where a woman can take a man, restrain him fully with his legs apart and kick his balls as much as she feels is fair. I have heard them called “rupture rooms”; as often the men are taken to these places to feel rupture. Another characteristic is a woman being able to use the room as she pleases and no need to prove a mans guilt. A woman often needs no evidence and can just accuse a man then take him to a rupture room and punish him. Or if guilt looks likley he can be punished and if proven innocent later then that is considered just hard luck. What are your thoughts Mr mans rights activist on this system as a tool for punishing men?”

Kicking rooms or rupture rooms are a very good tested and proven model. The separate room means a man can be taken somewhere closed and private. This means any sounds of pain don’t bother other people and give the male and female privacy. These rooms can be used in places of work or even places like hotels to punish guests. The model works everywhere really and has been very successful.

I saw you mentioned the idea of a woman not needing proof. This comes from the more modern way of looking at accusation that favours the victim not the criminal. Under the modern system the pressure is on the man to prove he is innocent of an accusation not the woman. This is to support victims and help them achieve a fair and desired result. This has been very successful as it has helped increase the number of accusations that lead to punishment and helped women achieve justice who would not have had it otherwise.

It is also far better that if a man is accused of a crime he is punished even on little evidence. Its better to stop a predator than let one go.

With the kicking room a man accused of a crime is asked to go to the room and is restrained in it. Then when he is fully restrained with his legs apart so his testicles are exposed is he then told of his suspected crime. Because of how the man is tied this gives the woman the advantage and the trial happens on her terms. If he cant prove innocence he is found guilty. Then he is then punished and can do nothing to prevent punishment. This system is used for all kinds of punishment but makes rupture much easier for the woman. The man is still so kicking the testicles is far easier and he is no threat so she can focus on maximising pain. This process is very good because it has helped women feel safer when using rupture and post rupture torture.

It also makes it easy for kicking to continue after rupture as well. This is important because feminists don’t want rupture to be seen as the end of a punishment but part of it. After a rupture has been caused the pain felt by the man is much higher and some see this as the point where he is truly punished. Women are actually been recommended to continue after rupture and in most cases of rupture kicking should continue so stopping kicks at the point of rupture should be more rare.

For instance one technique when a testicle ruptures is to decrease the force of the kicks to half because the testicle only need a little force to cause massive pain. Then give a kick every 2 minutes as the pain of a kick takes far longer to fade. The man is then given 30 kicks so this part takes an hour. This is made possible because of the room.

So I and many men support these rooms and understand why a womans accusation is enough to find men guilty. I haven’t suffered rupture but I have been punished in these rooms a few times. I support the rooms and want more of them. Don’t listen to trolls.