letter from mens right groups

Hi all,

Got a letter from David from a mens rights group. Its an interesting read and not what I expected. Please have a look and see what you think. I am leaning towards supporting the guy.

Hi Lucy,

I am a member of a men’s rights group and I have been reading your blog and similar sources regarding the subject of testicle punishments on men. I, like many other of your followers have seen testicle punishments increase in popularity, become more acceptable and become far more common. As a man it is a reality for me that this is a real thing and it is here to stay.

This movement has formed because men need controlling and their behaviour needs to be improved. It has come about due to an increase in sexual harassment and the rape culture we now see. In places where testicle punishment is used on men the improvement in these areas is huge. There is no denying that it has had a positive effect and sadly some men will not behave correctly because it is the right thing, they need a deterrent. Most of the time the punishment is a session of testicle kicking or the use of a crusher to press the testicles to cause pain. I have had 4 kicking sessions and 2 crushing ones in the past 18 months. The women explained what I did wrong and how I was to pay. The punishment was then given and done with respect. But for more serious crimes or when they are sexual in nature a more serious punishment is required. Testicle rupture.

I am writing because mens rights groups are often accused of trying to undo the good women have done in some areas. We are accused of wanting to stop testicle punishment despite the good it has done and we are used as evidence that not all people support the use of testicular rupture as a method of punishment. We are accused of wanting men accused of crimes to escape justice and get away with whatever they want and denying women their basic rights. We are also accused of rupture shaming which is a serious crime so it is no wonder a lot of people hate us. I don’t blame you if you do but this is not true. I am hoping you will let me explain why.

There are men who don’t support these punishments mainly because they know they will have to take them because they want to behave badly. They then miss quote us or lie and say we are against the use of rupture when we are not. I would like to give an example.

I heard of a situation where a man touched a womans bum when talking to her. She asked him to stop so he did it again. She reported him and a group of women agreed he needed to be punished. They confronted him and he claimed he was innocent, then claimed it was not a big deal. He was sentenced to have a testicle ruptured and flattened by the testicle twist. For the record I feel this is a more than fair punishment. The man way laid down and it took around an hour to apply the punishment and totally flatten the testicle. After he had recovered he told the women that mens rights groups were annoyed and would pay for lawyers so he could sue them. This was not true we cant and would not do that plus he is not a member. We actually agree 100% with the womens actions. But the women cancelled 2 planned ruptures on two different men for minor crimes and were clearly worried. So he caused damage with the lie and people believed it so I can understand why we are hated. The sad thing is one of the men sentenced to rupture (by kicking) agreed he deserved it and admitted so once the punishment was cancelled.

In another case a man was sentenced to rupture for stalking. The women discussed the facts and decided on what would is probably the commonly accepted punishment for this crime. The man claimed that because he never acted on anything mens rights groups would name and shame the two women who sentenced him to rupture. The man was tied up to have his testicles kicked but scared the women so they let him go. Again this was a totally lie.

My last example is a there was another forum about a year ago that discussed post rupture torture. The page offered good advice for prolonging the torture and maximising pain. Prolonging the torture gives a man more time to learn from the mistake and regret his poor decision. So this was a good resource for women to use. The site was commended by many women who were keen to try the technique and learn. Sadly the comments section was attacked by trolls claiming to support mens rights. The page was taken down soon after. This were trolls who did not like the idea of paying for their crimes. It was not mens right campaigners but the damage was done and again people hated us.

SO if this is not us who are we?

We are a lose group of men and women who agree with the use of testicle punishments but just want to make sure men have some basic rights through the process. There are

1, when a man is about to be punished he should be given a reason why and his punishment should be described.

2, If rupture is planned or likely then medical care should be arranged. We accept the cost should rest on the man but he may need help.

3, The punishment no matter how severe should be done professionally and privately. Small groups can watch but not large public events. If the man respects the woman they should respect him.

We just want to make sure these points are upheld and that is it. We all actually support the use of testicular rupture when the woman thinks it is needed. Her decision to use rupture should be respected and rupture shaming is not acceptable. We actually think the punishment for rupture shaming should be testicular rupture followed by at least 30 minutes of post rupture torture increasing depending on the case. It is only fair men pay a fair price for this crime. We strongly encourage anyone who believes a man’s comments on rupture in general, a certain case of it or post rupture torture report the man. This helps create a more positive environment where women can discuss rupture free from haters. It also means men who commit the crime of shaming can learn from it and be dealt with in a fair and constructive way.

We feel it important that if a man is accused of a crime by a woman the obligation is on the man to prove his innocence. It is hard to prove a man has done or said something small so the womans word is enough and she should not be expected to provide proof. If the man cant quickly prove he did not do what he is accused of then he must accept guilt and punishment.

Using rupture has changed communities and works as a great way to deter crime. There is an immediate positive change in the average mans behaviour when he learns he is being watched and can be sentenced to rupture if desired by a woman. We actually want to promote the use of rupture where we can and we want to show that a mans rights group supports it. Any good natured man who has made a mistake and is sentenced to rupture should understand the decision. He should respect it and cooperate fully. We also think the process should be as easy as possible for a woman to arrange to apply a rupture and post rupture torture. She should not face delays or questions and the man accused should help as much as he can.

In the event a man suffers rupture and has a testicle destroyed but is found innocent we believe he should understand mistakes can be made and a womans safety comes first. He should bare no grudge at all and should be punished if he does. But the woman who punished him should help him clear his name.

We also support the use of post rupture torture and understand how the long and very painful process helps a man learn. The high pain pleases a woman as well. We feel it is just another tool a woman can use on a man to punish him. We support women being educated on it and using it as they feel it is needed.

We support the notion that “punishment does not end at rupture” and want to help dispel the myth that it does. We follow the recommendation of feminists which recommends when kicking to cause rupture continuing and applying at least 10 more kicks to the man. This helps make sure the testicle has ruptured correctly and is damaged properly. Kicks felt by a man after rupture are far more painful so continuing kicking adds a lot of value to his punishment. So not only does punishment not end at rupture but feminists encourage it to continue after.

We also support kicking sessions where kicking continues even after both testicles have been ruptured so the first rupture actually happens about half way through the punishment. The testicles still feel full pain even when much of their contents has leaked out. So kicking can still benefit the man. Especially if you don’t want to touch a mans testicles kicking like this can deliver good pain too.

We actually want men who try to spread the myth that punishment needs to stop at rupture to be changed. We consulted feminists to decide a punishment we should support and it is a minimum punishment of testicle rupture plus 30 minutes of post testicle torture if they agree to admit they were lying or castration and 90 minutes of post rupture torture if they do not. We feel a man should be punished firmly in this situation.

We also do not support limits on when a woman can use rupture or post rupture torture. We are also against a plan to limit post rupture torture to 60 minutes. We feel it is an unfair limit on women and sends the wrong message. Instead we want women to know they can punish a man as much as they desire. It is our believe that a good man suffering post rupture torture would offer no objections to it lasting more than 60 minutes if the woman feels it is fair.

We also do not support a proposed ban on the process know as full flattening or fulling draining a ruptured testicle we support this method of punishment. To clarify this is where a testicle is ruptured and very, very slowly the woman carefully applies pressure to tear the internal structures of the testicle and push the tubes out of the testicle so they float around in the scrotum. This is often compared to getting the last bit of tooth paste out of the tube. This is a very painful process for the man and lasts normally between 60 to 120 minutes per testical. As a man feel this done he is given time to learn from the mistake and feeling the testicle destroyed gradually is a metaphor for how a man slowly takes rights away from women. So it is a fitting punishment for mansplanning or any comments that degrade women. The man first erodes the rights of a woman very gradually so as punishment he feels his testicle drained slowly. Mens rights groups have been accused protesting this but this is not true. Because of how effective it is and how the metaphor connects perfectly with so many crimes I remember us connecting feminists to show our support. We are actually working to educate men and women on the metaphor and good times to use this punishment. Please understand we are as opposed to a ban on this highly effective and symbolic punishment as many of you are.

We do want to support the idea of rupture being used mainly for more serious crimes but always at the womans discretion. We support mens rights and want to give men a voice but we also support fair, correct punishments. We also support the guidance of feminists on how men should be punished. Any good man having a punishment decided just wants what the woman wants and that is a fair punishment. We feel by men and women working together we can create a better world. SO I hope you see we are not evil people but want whats best.

It would be nice to hear your thoughts and I hope I have changed some minds.