Dealing with sexual harassment

I would like to write a bit on how to handle cases of sexual harassment and similar behaviour. By sexual harassment I mean any behaviour that could be seen as sexual in nature that is undesirable to the target. This can include stalking/following, unwanted advances, unwanted message from a man to a woman, or general weird or strange behaviour.

I have heard about people being unsure of how to deal with this for a number of reasons and have several points of confusion. Women and a growing number of men want to make sure they deal with this correctly and that the appropriate punishment is given to the male.

1, Proving guilt of the male

2, how harsh should the punishment be

3, how serious is the offense

4, finding a fair outcome for both the male and female

Let me start with explaining how serious sexually harassing behaviour is.  It is extremely serious because while the instance the male is accused of does not sound like much it is always a stepping stone to more dangerous behaviour. No man just rapes a woman they start off acting creepy or strange to women then committing acts of sexual harassment that lead to the desire to rape so it is very serious. So serious that even the smallest case should be reported and dealt with.

The next point is the question of how should the male be punished. This is where there is some confusion even among women. Some women think that if the male was just being a bit strange then a short kicking session should be enough but that is wrong. Given how serious the crime is the punishment must match that. Even if he is accused of something small you are seeing a male on the path to rape and that will one day rape so he must be punished for that.

The recommended punishment therefor is in cases where the male has maybe accidently appeared creepy or where he confesses quickly showing remorse and a desire to be punished very harshly is to slowly torture both testicles and rupture then flatten out one testicle. In other cases the recommended punishment is a very slow and torturous castration. In most cases castration will be the only option. Once a man stands accused of sexual harassment the rupturing of a testicle is unavoidable.

Proving guilt is often important as women want to be fair to males. But rape is very serious and a terrible thing for a woman to go through so even if the chances are small a male will commit rape then castrating him is by far the better option. A good man would prefer to have a testicle ruptured than to know a woman was raped.

Given how serious this is the burden of proof is very low so a statement from a woman about a male is enough to find him guilty. No other evidence is needed. Also if a woman is unsure of the identity of the male she is accusing she can guess and that male can be questioned and unless he can prove he were not at that location or did not do the act definitively then the male can be found guilty and punished. If the male has proof then the woman must be given time to revise her statement if she wants to change the details or add more. This helps to achieve a decision of guilty so punishment can occur. These sessions of questioning can help to find the truth and allow both male and female to speak so as to add fairness. Also by questioning the male more evidence can come to light so his punishment can be increased from one rupture to a castration

We all want men to be treated fairly and this many sound extreme but a man should understand why he must be castrated. Most men will understand how bad rape is and know it must be stopped so they will understand why castration is needed. But given how low the burden of proof is there will be cases where a male is innocent but found guilty. These cases are hard for a male but castration must be done. Women did not ask for men to be rapists so he should not complain at the steps needed to stop it. Even if he is innocent it is hoped he will support a painful castration as punishment. It would be selfish of him to want to put more importance on his testicles than a woman’s safety. So a good man will support the punishment and a selfish one will not. 

Even if he is innocent it is hoped both man and woman can agree punishment is needed and carry it out. A good man will support this. The punishment then should be done slowly.  A woman should study ways to prolong the pain and prefect her torture technique. She should also learn how to flatten out a testicle so the man suffers a fair punishment. The man should be restrained and the pain should last at least an hour. The testicles can be crushed individually in a crusher very slowly as a method.

Or there is a technique where a metal pole about 8mm in diameter with a rounded end is used. This is pushed into a testicle at different points deep enough to cause pain and internal damage. The point is slowly pushed harder and softer on the point then moved and this is repeated. This method requires practice but a testicle can last over 2 hours before rupturing while keeping the man in high pain. This is perfect for use on a man weather he is innocent or not.

Once punished the task is complete and the world is a little safer. Please share your thoughts.