A brief History

This is an amazing account that was mailed to me. Fell free to ask him questions.

I havent written anything in a while so are there any subjects anyone wants covering?

After studying at university I continued to work there and have for over 20 years. This has meant I have been around women who use causing pain and or damage to the testicles as a punishment for my adult life. I have seen these punishments being used very successfully to improve men’s behaviour and the community as a whole.

In the beginning testicle kicking was the preferred method of punishment. If the male was to take a few kicks he would just be ordered to stand and take them but if he needed more he would be tied in place naked and kicked the needed number of times. I myself have felt over a dozen of these kicking punishments and they did change the way I act. As these became popular most men and women supported them and they were encouraged. Over time the intensity of the kicking session increased and I always supported this. Women would use more kicks and make each kick harder to improve the punishment. One step was for women to wear hard shoes or practice technique to cause more damage to the testicles.

When talking to a woman who punished me for being late twice with a 4 year gap in-between. I agreed the later and much harsher punishment was more effective. First I was punished with 20 kicks which she considered standard at the time then I was punished with 35 kicks while she wore hard boots. The second time my testicles were very swollen at the end and I was in a lot of pain. I agreed the second session made me think more about my actions so it was better.

As the intensity of the kicking sessions improved so did the number of testicle ruptures. When kicking you apply a sudden force to the testicles so when you do this harder it can cause rupture. Many ruptures were accidental but as a reasonable man I know it is impossible to conduct a proper kicking session without there being a chance of testicle rupture. So if a man is being reasonable he must accept that ruptures cant possibly be avoided.

Another point of controversy was the disagreement about what should happen during a kicking session if one of the man’s testicles ruptures. One side comprised mainly of men said the session should stop whereas the other said the session should continue until the man has taken all the kicks he was sentenced to. I feel the later is correct and they appear to have won that debate. One problem with the first groups opinion is that many women were starting to sentence men to  a number of kicks designed to cause a rupture. This meant the first group were stopping this. I agreed with the second group and I am pleased they won.

Another good improvement was when women  started making minimum numbers of kicks men had to take for crimes as a way to increase the standard of punishment. Many women were worried about looking cruel and wanted to avoid over punishing but minimum punishments helped them feel confident using much larger numbers of kicks. I supported this as it helped women feel more confident and prevented men getting off easy.

Minimum punishments were also used very successfully to increase the number of testicle ruptures. There became a long list of offenses where the lowest number of kicks the man could take would be highly likely to cause a rupture. This resulted in women causing ruptures confidently and could always blame the rules and it made it so men often felt there was nothing they could do to avoid rupture. This did more than any other advancement to normalise the use of testicle rupture in common life then anything else. It was very successful and it’s a model that should be copied all over. (I will happily go into more detail if anyone wants)

In recent years, maybe the last 5 or so I have seen an increase in the severity of punishments used. The number of kicks required for a crime was increased and as a result instances of testicle rupture increased as well. Over time more and more women wanted to cause a rupture for various crimes. Then rupture alone was not enough the ruptured testicle was then expected to be damaged to the point it would never heal and in the last few years I have read articles on a process called testicle flattening. This is where a woman squeezes all the internals out of a testicle leaving only the testicle wall. This is another level of pain again but it is very effective. This type of punishment really does scare me but I am forced to accept it is very effective and works very well in a number of situations. I would recommend any women learn testicle flattening and consider using it.

At first this was quite terrifying. When a testicle is ruptured the pain caused is far higher then when the testicle is just being kicked or crushed. Then the man will probably lose the testicle for life. As a man this is a serious prospect and I am scared even talking about it. But I can accept the extreme pain caused is very effective and the loss of a testicle is also a good deterrent from bad behaviour. So I can understand why women have been using testicle rupture more and more. I also feel I should support this and encourage women wanting to use rupture as much as possible. We have gotten to a point now where it is very easy for a man to say the wrong thing and be sentenced to rupture. This has improved things and I have no objection to it but I have spent a lot of time thinking about how I would handle taking that kind of punishment.

I also want to note I think the rise in popularity of the testicle twist is mainly to provide women with an easier way to cause a rupture and know the testicle has ruptured. It also is a good way to perform flattening. I have not felt the twist yet but I know it can be very painful. I would be scared to take the twist but I would want a female friend to know how to do it and use it on me if she ever felt it was needed. I like many men fear punishment but know it has to happen.

It’s a new world and it is a better one.Please feel free to comment of ask questions.